On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:42:59 +0200 Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 30 September 2004 18:05, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > > While I can see the advantage of keeping awl and prefs in a sql > > database, I can't see an advantage to keeping bayes data in a sql > > db. > > > > Can someone point out an advantage? Would there be any disadvantage > > in keeping everything except bayese in sql? > You could have two front end servers using the same Bayes backend with > SQL. This makes autolearning work easily across multiple servers. > An interesting thought. I'm not sure we'd need it, but I'll remember it. The reason I brought this up is because we'd once tested dspam with mysql and found that mysql seemed more likely to slow down considerably as disk i/o demands rose. It appeared to me that berkeleydb was less touchy that way, though I suspect issues of lock contention might be greater. -- Robin Lynn Frank Director of Operations Paradigm-Omega, LLC http://www.paradigm-omega.com ============================== Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
pgpE7Ad9dV9fy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
