If anyone remembers this thread, I have more feedback. After disabling Bayes, AWL, and reducing the system to 4 children, I now am running average scan times of 3.5 seconds. Much better!
You devs are some seriously sexy coders! --Chris (Bayes?......poppycock!) >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 7:26 AM >> To: 'Nick Leverton'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) >> Subject: RE: scan times up! >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Nick Leverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 6:49 AM >> >To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) >> >Subject: Re: scan times up! >> > >> > >> >On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: >> >> Well... >> >> >> >> ver avg scan time >> >> 2.4x 2.7 seconds >> >> 3.0 30.4 seconds >> >> >> >> OH MY! Network test :) >> >> >> >> Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;) >> > >> >Have you got a local (on-site, preferably on-machine) DNS cache ? >> >This makes a lot of difference to the DNS-based network tests (which >> >is to say, most of them). One mail probably won't see much >difference, >> >but when the next one comes in, many of its lookups are >> >already cached :) >> > >> >> This is also on my list of TTD. I'm running on some very old iron as >well. >> The 5 children might be bothering the sysem a little. I may reduce >that. >> >> I'll post some feedback if my users ever let me get back to it :) >> >> --Chris >
