Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles
unless SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis. Ooops
now nobody will see this email.
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509 222329
--- Begin Message ---
Ron,
I thought this might amuse you - took me a moment to work out the
problem...
--
[ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
--- Begin Message ---
This is a Mailman mailing list bounce action notice:
List: Exim-users
Member: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: Subscription disabled.
Reason: Excessive or fatal bounces.
The triggering bounce notice is attached below.
Questions? Contact the Mailman site administrator at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Begin Message ---
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This mail box is not accepting spam. If you feel your e-mail is not spam,
please e-mail me again asking for a whitelist entry.
------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail by suzaku.infostations.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.41 #1
(Gentoo))
id 1CF9Pl-0002AU-AC
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 03:52:58 -0700
Received: from sesame.csx.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.41])
by suzaku.infostations.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41 #1 (Gentoo))
id 1CF9Pk-0002AN-Lb
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 03:52:57 -0700
Received: from [::1] (port=3769 helo=sesame.csx.cam.ac.uk)
by sesame.csx.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.42)
id 1CF9Mh-0003rQ-Pb; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:49:47 +0100
Received: from scamper.lut.ac.uk ([158.125.1.219]:40354)
by sesame.csx.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CF9Mf-0003r9-3Z
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:49:47 +0100
Received: from [131.231.80.5] (helo=[131.231.80.5])
by scamper.lut.ac.uk with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34)
id 1CF9Pk-0003fc-Uf
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:52:57 +0100
From: Ron McKeating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exim-Users (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2)
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:52:56 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scan-Signature: 002eea541692a829a8250b7ac6c1eabb
X-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---)
Subject: [exim] system filter
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: A user list for the exim MTA <exim-users.exim.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on
kurama.infostations.net
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=4.0 required=4.0 tests=CIALIS2 autolearn=no
version=2.64
X-Spam-Report:
* 4.0 CIALIS2 BODY: Contains the word "cialis".
Does the system filter apply to a message that is rejected at the data
stage. IE if the data acl gives a 550 reject does that mean that message
is never passed through the system filter?
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Internet Services and Software Solutions
Loughborough University
01509 222329
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details
at http://www.exim.org/ ##
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
