-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 11/17/2004 11:59 PM, Michael Parker wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:15:23PM -0800, Rupa Schomaker wrote: [postgres+spamassassin stuffs]
> You should look at Bug 3771: > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3771 > and feel free to comment or improve the patch. > > Michael Some questions: Is bytea really necessary? If I follow the path of the patch, the bytea change was done prior to adding the index. Since the tokens are binary data it is probably more correct through, especially if one has a encoding other than SQL_ASCII set for the DB... What do you use to benchmark changes? I'm willing to experiment but would like to have some reproducable results for ya... - -- -Rupa -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBnLdfL3Aub+krmycRArBpAKDkBfGEgFV+dTuICX65dcVj6kgC/gCg4T8f wVjXo9qfbyELXrg6R1HIVNU= =sj4T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
