Matt Kettler wrote: > Actually, In my experience, DCC contains very little solicited bulk. It > also contains much less solicited bulk mail than razor does. This is of > course completely contrary to Razor's goal of not containing solicited > email, and DCC's claim of not caring.
Agreed. That is consistent with my other statement. > > [Although it turns out that most don't because most people follow the > > rules and whitelist subscribed mailing lists thereby avoiding logging > > legitimate mailing list messages to the database. And since well > > behaved mailing lists are not the problem there is no reason to log > > them there.] Most non-spam sources are not logged in DCC because there is no reason to do so. Bob
