Chris Santerre wrote:
>> Was the whitelist you were referring to really the SURBL server-side whitelist?
>
>
> Yes! But local SURBL whitelists are needed to reduce traffic and time.
I'd much rather see SURBL respond with 127.0.0.0 with a really large TTL for white listed domains. Any sensible setup will run a local DNS cache which will take care of the load and time issue.
Daryl
