If the call to spamd fails
then the message is passed back. Basically if it fails it just isn't
scanned.
But there usually aren'y many problems with
SA. Many of us are running it on high volume systems in complex
configurations with no problems.
Gary
From: Kang, Joseph S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 1/11/2005 8:24 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: spamassassin + filter.sh
I'm really new to Postfix so I'm reading this thread
with a lot of interest.
I took a look at the Wiki and didn't see
anything that addressed my concern.
According to some of the doc related to
implementing SA on the Postfix.org
site, the example shown involved calling
SA and not spamc. Apparently, the
problem with this method is that if
the spamassassin call fails, then
Postfix won't process the message at
all.
So, I'm looking for pointers on using spamd/spamc with Postfix that
won't
cause delivery problems if there are operational problems with
SA.
TIA!
Joe K.
