At 03:38 AM 1/13/2005, werner detter wrote:
> Yeah, so? Why should this inhibit you from using spamd now?

hm, but even if i implement spamd/spamc - i still got the problem that every mail (even if
it's bigger then e.g. 4mb is passed through spamd/spamc then insteat of spamassassin.
please correct me if i'm wrong ....

You're wrong... spamc automatically skips emails over a specified size, by default 250k.


Hence why I keep suggesting spamc/spamd.. spamc does what you want to do already....



Reply via email to