On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 4:57:57 PM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 8:15:12 AM, Darren Coleman wrote:
>> Figured out why URIBL_SBL wasn't firing for me for that email - I can't
>> even resolve that domain!  Have tried resolving it on several machines I
>> have shell access to (including external machines who peer with
>> different providers), and none of them can do it.

> Which domain?  sbl.spamhaus.org should resolve from anywhere....

> Jeff C.

Or far more precisely, you should be able to duplicate this
result:

% dig 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org a

; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org a
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65527
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 15, ADDITIONAL: 13
;; QUERY SECTION:
;;      2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org, type = A, class = IN

;; ANSWER SECTION:
2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org.  2H IN A  127.0.0.2

Jeff C.
-- 
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/

Reply via email to