> -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 January 2005 01:07 > To: Jeff Chan > Cc: Darren Coleman; Jack L. Stone; Loren Wilton; > users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Lots of spam being missed with SA 3.0.2 + lots of RulesEmp > rules > > On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 4:57:57 PM, Jeff Chan wrote: > > On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, 8:15:12 AM, Darren Coleman wrote: > >> Figured out why URIBL_SBL wasn't firing for me for that email - I can't > >> even resolve that domain! Have tried resolving it on several machines > I > >> have shell access to (including external machines who peer with > >> different providers), and none of them can do it. > > > Which domain? sbl.spamhaus.org should resolve from anywhere.... > > > Jeff C. > > Or far more precisely, you should be able to duplicate this > result: > > % dig 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org a > > ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org a > ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > ;; got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65527 > ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 15, ADDITIONAL: 13 > ;; QUERY SECTION: > ;; 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org, type = A, class = IN > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > 2.0.0.127.sbl.spamhaus.org. 2H IN A 127.0.0.2 > > Jeff C. > -- > Jeff Chan > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.surbl.org/
Hi Jeff, Yes, I get that result :) However when I do an nslookup on "sbl.spamhaus.org" I get: Server: 212.113.196.3 Address: 212.113.196.3#53 Non-authoritative answer: *** Can't find sbl.spamhaus.org: No answer I presume this is intended behaviour when the dig statement above works. As it happens I am also seeing URIBL_SBL hits in my spam now so obviously it is querying the RBL correctly. Thanks all for your help. Daz
