Of course, that's not universally true, Keith. Someone is flooding the
Internet with email messages so bogus fetchmail spits up on it. I had to
telnet into the Earthlink server and manually delete the message.
====8<----
list
+OK
1 475
.
retr 1
+OK 475 octets
Status: U
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adslsapo-b4-9-210.telepac.pt ([81.193.9.210])
by mx-a065b05.pas.sa.earthlink.net (EarthLink SMTP Server) with SMTP
id 1cPnx42wr3NZFpL0
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:14:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([81.193.9.210]) by
iq1[1
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 01:14:07 -0800 (PST)
.
====8<----
That is the ENTIRE extent of what was on the Earthlink server.
Oy! A new DOS attack....
{^_^}
----- Original Message -----
From: "Keith Whyte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Joe Zitnik wrote:
>
> >some of these e-mails are
> >getting caught by my rule and some aren't. When I run the ones that are
> >getting past through spamassassin manually, they hit my rule as well and
> >are above my spam threshold. So why do they make it past?
> >
> >
> Joe, how can you possibly ask that question without also sending your
> rule and an example of a mail that got past your rule
> we are not psychic!!
>
> Keith.
