On Wed, 2005-01-19 at 09:39, Frank M. Cook wrote: > > SA shouldn't have this problem. However, the larger issue of whether or > not > > any sort of SPAM filtering solution is considered legal is my concern. > > this is an argument for simply rewriting the subject so that the user can > decide whether to block the mail with local rules, or not.
Not necessarily, if the basis of the legal argument is confidentiality rather than failure to deliver. [Mitch says:] There is also the issue of user involvement... if the service is optional, and the users are processing their own mail, they would have to rule that people don't have a right to process their own data - wouldn't they? m/
