-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 21. Januar 2005 14:30 schrieb John Fleming: > Since upgrading v2.64 to 3.0.2, I have a much higher false negative rate. > I posted one a couple of days ago that involved a "trusted" issue. I just > got a medication-spam this morning that ONLY triggered bayes_99, although > it mentioned sexual health, anxiety and others I would've thought would've > triggered more rules.
Another case for my magic eye. Maybe I will find it some day. Some times they come trough. Spamer react on filters. Do you use network tests? Spamer changed the servers frequently. > > Is a lot of reconfiguration usually necessary when upgrading 2.64 to 3.0? > I thought I understood that 3.0 incorporated several of the rulesets that > were previously separate, and besides, I haven't removed any old rulesets > yet anyway. I have upgraded three server fom 2.63 to 3.0.x. Normaly there are only small changes in the configuration for now unsupported options. The ammount of reconfiguration depneds on your installation. > > Any comments? Tnx! Keep your body informed. Garbage in - garbage out. Thomas - -- icq:133073900 http://www.t-arend.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB8RCFHe2ZLU3NgHsRAp4IAJ9Ssms7Cj357sCmsrDDCOL9Ac93DgCdFapR VKhrq4CNSbQIFCc13e9PVFU= =JnPW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
