On Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 6:20:50 PM, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 09:11 PM 2/2/2005, Shane Mullins wrote: >>Here is a link from ZDNet warning of a spam increase. I can't wait to see >>SA smat it down.
> Hmm.. so zombies are going to start using the legit mailserver instead of > acting as a direct delivery... Hmm.. Well, we should see the DUL RBL hits > drop off pretty fast. Won't affect SURBL hits though. > The only problem I see with the tactic is the ISP itself is likely to deal > with the infected users pretty quickly, instead of dragging their feet, > since the spam will now be bogging down their servers, instead of bypassing > them. And the answer is: scan outbound mail using SURBLs. Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/