On Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 6:20:50 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:11 PM 2/2/2005, Shane Mullins wrote:
>>Here is a link from ZDNet warning of a spam increase.  I can't wait to see 
>>SA smat it down.

> Hmm.. so zombies are going to start using the legit mailserver instead of 
> acting as a direct delivery... Hmm.. Well, we should see the DUL RBL hits 
> drop off pretty fast. Won't affect SURBL hits though.

> The only problem I see with the tactic is the ISP itself is likely to deal 
> with the infected users pretty quickly, instead of dragging their feet, 
> since the spam will now be bogging down their servers, instead of bypassing 
> them.

And the answer is:  scan outbound mail using SURBLs.

Jeff C.
-- 
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/

Reply via email to