On 2 Jan 2018, at 07:17, David Jones djo...@ena.com> wrote:
I haven't redefined these rules from what I can tell by searching my
local rules. I would think that if I had done this, then there would be
consistent non-hits of BAYES_99 with BAYES_999 all of the time. This is
only happening a small percentage of the time.
On 02.01.18 15:39, @lbutlr wrote:
Checking my mail I see an incidence rate of this of about 0.5%, which matches
the rate you posted earlier.
amavis?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.
