Who is the ignorant here? Rfc 822, standard: usa Rfc 2822, *proposed standard*: usa Rfc 5321, *draft standard*: usa Rfc 5322, *draft standard*: usa ...
The list goes on. To you, and those like you, who claim better knowledge, read twice yourself, because the actual standard is still rfc 822. Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 18:52, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: > On 2018-02-11 (00:13 MST), Rupert Gallagher wrote: > > Interesting to kreme. > Not actually interesting to me, no. > We are not in USA, where RFC loopholes > are written to allow the NSA to send anonymous email with spyware, or > companies to profit from massmail marketing. Spam assassins we are for real. > RFC's have nothing to do with the USA, and are written by (and contributed to > by) anyone with expertise who cares to work on them. Your delusions about > them are concerning as they expose deep faults in your knowledge. Any mail > admin who thinks s/he can ignore RFC because "they're Americans" is likely > going to cause problems, not just for themselves and their unfortunate users, > but for other servers as well. -- "I don't care if Bill Gates is the world's > biggest philanthropist. The pain he has inflicted on the world in the past 20 > years through lousy products easily outweighs any good he has done.... Apple > is as arrogant as Microsoft but at least its stuff works as advertised" - > Graem Philipson @protonmail.com>
