On 22 Feb 2018, at 4:15, saqariden wrote:
Hello guys,
i'm using mimedefang with spamassasin, when I test an email with the
command "spamassain -t file.eml", I got results like this:
Dails de l'analyse du message: (-5.8 points, 3.0 requis)
-5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at
http://www.dnswl.org/, high
trust
[70.38.112.54 listed in list.dnswl.org]
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: L'algorithme Bayien a alula
probabilitde spam
entre 0 et 1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host
with no rDNS
0.3 TO_EQ_FM_DOM_SPF_FAIL To domain == From domain and external SPF
failed
However, the SA check which was done trough mimedefang, seems like
giving other scores, how can i test an email to get these scores, and
saw the difference.
Typically mimedefang runs as its own special user (e.g. 'defang') which
may be configured to block normal interactive use or even simple 'su'
use by root. This means that if you run 'spamassassin -t' in an
interactive shell, you use the user_prefs, AWL/TxRep and BayesDB for the
user running that shell, not the special user. This is particularly
problematic for 'learning' ham and spam for the BayesDB, because it is
easy to end up either training into a DB that is entirely separate from
the system-wide one used by mimedefang OR working with the system-wide
DBs in ways that change ownership of them so that mimedefang can't use
them.
My solution for this is to use sudo and these shell aliases:
satest='sudo -H -u defang spamassassin -t '
lham='sudo -H -u defang sa-learn --ham --progress '
lspam='sudo -H -u defang sa-learn --spam --progress '
blspam='sudo -H -u defang spamassassin --add-to-blacklist '
reportspam='sudo -H -u defang spamassassin -r -t '
