On 2018-03-09 09:26, David Jones wrote: > RAZOR like DCC and PYZOR shouldn't be used as a sole source of > determining spam. These are indicators that combine with other rule > hits and scores to be one of many factors. If the score was 10 or > more then you would worry about reporting FPs.
Well, _someone_ has to report the FP (I think Razor, confusingly, terms that "whitelisting") for the misclassification to be reversed. That's how Razor is supposed to work - it is a reputation service, both positive and negative, not just a list of badness. Making the score less than a poison pill helps _you_ avoid a FP but it leaves the wrong result in place for other recipients. -- Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet, if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup. To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.
