>> > On Mon, 18 Jun 2018 06:13:06 -0600 @lbutlr wrote:
>> >> I have a script that runs when a mail is moved out of the Junk
>> >> folder to pass the mail through sa-learn --ham,
>You can work around the plugin's deficiencies by using autotraining
>or doing some additional training, but then the plugin is of limited
>relevance.
On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 10:41:51 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Of course, both autotraining AND the fixing errors are required to
work properly.
On 19.06.18 22:27, RW wrote:
Then you have worst of both worlds. I'm not saying the plugin is
completely useless for Bayes, but 'not completely useless' is not
much of a recommendation.
I'd say the best, or nearly the best:
- autolearning works
- user can correct mistakes.
one downside is that users will corerct only in case of score mismatch, not
bayes mismatch (so, even BAYES_999 won't be reported when not causing FP).
do you know of better way than manual reviewing all BAYES scores for all
mail?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
My mind is like a steel trap - rusty and illegal in 37 states.
