Matthew Lenz wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "AltGrendel"
To: <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: my girlfriend is getting ticked :)
Mike Jackson wrote:
Your bayes database looked to be reasonably trained. The
false-negative was labeled 99% spam by Bayes.
I don't see any RBL checks, which might have made the difference on
this one, if it's already been seen and flagged. Do you have
Net::DNS installed and the RLB tests enabled? What happens if you
feed it through spamassassin with the -D flag?
In my experience, it's more efficient to let the MTA handle the RBL
checks instead of Spamassassin. I can't remember what MTA the OP was
using, but it's trivial to set them up in Sendmail. On my employer's
boxes, I use the spamhaus.org lists, but on my personal box (where I
can be much more aggressive) I use a few of the rfc-ignorant.org
lists and ws.surbl.org. The spamhaus lists are checked first, and
they're highly effective.
Agreed, I setup my postfix to do the checks and it's made a world of
difference. The OP never said what OS/MTA is being used.
actually i did in my first post
"I'm using 3.0.2 on a debian woody box. Its from www.backports.org
(great site)"
Ok, so you're using Spamassassin 3.0.2 on Debian. Are you using
Sendmail, qmail, courier, or postfix? I honestly don't know that Debian
uses as a default mailserver.
