On Wed, 26 Jun 2019, Amir Caspi wrote:

Any idea why this spample didn't hit the ZWJ obfuscation rules?

They were looking for multiple obfuscations in a *single* word. I've loosened that a bit.

--
 John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
 jhar...@impsec.org    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
 key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Warning Labels we'd like to see #1: "If you are a stupid idiot while
 using this product you may hurt yourself. And it won't be our fault."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
 7 days until the 243rd anniversary of the Declaration of Independence

Reply via email to