On 11/25/2019 3:02 PM, Mikael Syska wrote:
Try and run:
sa-learn --dump magic
Should give you some information like:
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 493422 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 3867414 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 937781 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 1573870989 0 non-token data: oldest atime
0.000 0 1574715499 0 non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last journal
sync atime
0.000 0 1574712064 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 0 812640 0 non-token data: last expire
atime delta
0.000 0 204342 0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
Thank you so much for the suggestion. I tried running it as user
spamd: sa-learn -u spamd --dump magic
I got this response: ERROR: Bayes dump returned an error, please re-run
with -D for more information. I ran it with -D and got the following
relevant lines:
Nov 27 00:13:23.325 [17354] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB
R/O: /home/spamd/bayes/bayes_toks
Nov 27 00:13:23.326 [17354] dbg: bayes: no dbs present, cannot tie DB
R/O: /home/spamd/bayes/bayes_toks
Just for fun, I tried sudo su and reran it, and got the output below.
So for whatever reason, either I'm not specifying to run sa-learn as
spamd user correctly or user spamd appears to not have permissions to
its own home dir. I did check that the bayes folder and all bayes_*
files inside it were owned by spamd. Any ideas? BTW the
/var/log/maillog shows that spamd itself is indeed finding and using the
db in that directory.
Thx
Here's the sudo su output:
[root@ip-172-31-47-84 ec2-user]# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 51391 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 6813 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 134303 0 non-token data: ntokens
0.000 0 1566344099 0 non-token data: oldest atime
0.000 0 1568249462 0 non-token data: newest atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last journal
sync atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expiry atime
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire
atime delta
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
Do note that every user has it's own DB ... can be overriden with
bayes_sql_override_username bayes
So if either "spamd" user or your own runs it ... you should get the
same result ...
( I'm actually running it in PgSQL, can't remember what the file based
is called )
mvh
Mikael Syska
---- On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 19:35:16 +0100 *Jerry Malcolm
<techst...@malcolms.com>* wrote ----
Thanks again to everyone who helped me get everything up and running
over the past couple of days.
Now that I have SA finding my bayes database, I'm curious about bayes
reporting. My bayes db is not new. I migrated my previous bayes db
from my old installation. And I've been training it with ~100+
new spam
messages in the past day. But I'm concerned that I'm not seeing
anything related to bayes in any scoring report. Nothing on any spam
message or good message over the past hundreds of message that have
arrived since getting bayes up and running in SA. I would expect at
least some messages to have a bayes rule fire, either positively or
negatively, or even just a 0.0 score based on bayes analysis. Is it
possible that after all of the setup I've done that bayes is still
not
activated? Is there a way to force a bayes entry in the scoring
summary
for an email just to confirm that it is indeed part of the scoring
process for spamd? I added "use_bayes 1" to the config just in case.
But no difference. I've got allow_tell activated, and training
with an
email is giving me a good rc (It was correctly giving an error
before I
added allow_tell). Just nothing in the scoring results for any
email.
