On Sat, 4 Jan 2020, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020, RW wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 15:29:40 -0700
Philip Prindeville wrote:
On Jan 3, 2020, at 11:34 AM, RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2020 10:09:21 -0800 (PST)
John Hardin wrote:
Try this instead, to actually match the header(s):
header __L_RECEIVED_SPF Received-SPF =~ /^./
That should be:
header __L_RECEIVED_SPF Received-SPF =~ /^./m
Seems to work either way!
Either should match, but without the /m it should only match once.
I just tried it and
meta L_RECEIVED_SPF (__L_RECEIVED_SPF >= 10)
doesn't work without the /m in __L_RECEIVED_SPF
Odd. I'll have to check that out. Perhaps SA is collapsing multiple headers
into a single line internally.
No, the /m shouldn't be needed. There's a rule counting Apparently-To
headers in my sandbox, without the /m, and the meta with the threshold
does fire.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The most glaring example of the cognitive dissonance on the left
is the concept that human beings are inherently good, yet at the
same time cannot be trusted with any kind of weapon, unless the
magic fairy dust of government authority gets sprinkled upon them.
-- Moshe Ben-David
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
305 days until the Presidential Election
