All,
In doing a sort of my mailbox, I'm finding that there are many popular
spams with to: undisclosed-recipients. Which is *legal* but, in some
cases shouldn't exist.
In our particular use case, the box we're looking to protect is the
dayjob's info@ box. Nobody should be bccing the thing. It's mainly
handled by forms, but it's around for historical reasons. It's
long-lived.
But in looking at the spams I've recieved, I don't see that it matched a
specific rule.
Some of these messages are DKIM signed, so I know it's not just something
added by my MTA/MUA.
Has anyone come up with a rule that's "canon" or should I write my own?
-Dan
--
--------Dan Mahoney--------
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---------------------------
