Hi Benny, It’s the authoritive nameserver giving that answer. With likely a view or acl response. So adding dnssec would not make much of a difference here.
Thanks, Raymond Dijkxhoorn > Op 12 mei 2021 om 23:24 heeft Benny Pedersen <m...@junc.eu> het volgende > geschreven: > > On 2021-05-12 23:01, Matthias Leisi wrote: >>>> Am 12.05.2021 um 21:02 schrieb Michael B Allen <iop...@gmail.com>: >>> X-Spam-Report: >>> * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, high >>> * trust >>> * [173.82.162.98 listed in list.dnswl.org] >> 173.82.162.98 is not in the dnswl.org database. >> It’s likely you’re using one of the nameservers who are not only >> blocked from using dnswl.org free nameserver infrastructure, but where >> we needed to use additional methods to make them stop (ab)using our >> nameservers (namely, returning a „_HI“ result in the hope that whoever >> is responsible will finally notice). > > would it not make sense to enable dnssec on dnswl.org nameservers ? > > sorry for asking, i dont know much about dns servers
