On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:06:15PM +0300, Henrik K wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 05:15:54PM +0200, Martin Flygenring wrote: > > > > Is there a limitation to SpamAssassin so it doesn't accept looking for the > > two X-Spam-headers, or can you spot why this rule isn't matching? > > SA removes all X-Spam-* headers from the message, it's not possible to match > on them.
... except with a kludgy full rule that matches the whole pristine message: full X_SPAM_FOOBAR /^X-Spam-Foobar: xyz/m
