> On Nov 15, 2021, at 5:06 PM, Greg Troxel <g...@lexort.com> wrote: > > > Philip Prindeville <philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com> writes: > >> Ah, the rule _eval_tests_type11_pri0_set1() took 4:20. >> >> Why can't I even find the rule? > > That looks very familiar. I was having timeouts, and saw that in the > logs, on certain messages. I ended up nuking and rebuilding my TXREP > database and then things were ok. > > That doesn't explain why we can't find the rule, which is a good > question. > Where is the TXREP database? Also, is it possible that the name is generated through some sort of mangling, the way that C function names can be generated from macro expansions, etc?
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limit in ..."... John Hardin
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limit in ...... Henrik K
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limit in... John Hardin
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limit in... Philip Prindeville
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limi... Henrik K
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time ... Philip Prindeville
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limit in ...... Loren Wilton
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limit in... John Hardin
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limit in ...... Philip Prindeville
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limit in... Greg Troxel
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limi... Philip Prindeville
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time ... Greg Troxel
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time ... Martin Gregorie
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded ... Bill Cole
- Re: Seeing "check: excee... Henrik K
- Re: Seeing "check: excee... Martin Gregorie
- Re: Seeing "check: excee... Dave Wreski
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded ... Philip Prindeville
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limit in... Bill Cole
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limi... Philip Prindeville
- Re: Seeing "check: exceeded time limit in... John Hardin