Hi, I'm seeing a lot of DCC/pyzor mail being marked as spam that shouldn't be, and want to see what can be done to prevent that.
For example, many emails with just an image attachment and an empty body are hitting DCC. I thought I recalled a way to create a checksum of these empty messages and add them to an allow list, but it seems it is specific to the sender, based on /var/lib/dcc/testmsg-whitelist: # empty Exchange ok hex fuz1 e038b933 6003e07e 8e990536 110cfa90 How do I generate that signature? I've been unable to find any instructions on how to do it. Same with pyzor? Another example is an email I received from Pizza Hut. Their marketing emails hit DCC and pyzor and sendgrid, making it very difficult for that email to be delivered unless it also hits some negative bayes or is allowlisted. Do people add them to the welcomelist? Do you train marketing emails for bayes? * 1.5 KAM_SENDGRID Sendgrid being exploited by scammers * 0.3 DIGEST_MULTIPLE Message hits more than one network digest check * 1.0 DCC_REPUT_95_98 DCC reputation between 95 and 98 % (mostly spam) * 0.5 KAM_REALLYHUGEIMGSRC RAW: Spam with image tags with ridiculously * huge http urls * 1.4 PYZOR_CHECK Listed in Pyzor * 3.0 BAYES_95 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 95 to 99% * [score: 0.9668] * 0.1 POISEN_SPAM_PILL_3 BODY: random spam to be learned in bayes Is sendgrid still as big of a problem as it was a year ago? There are a few negative rules, like TXREP and DKIMWL_WL and RCVD_IN_SENDERSCORE_90_100, but someone really doesn't want Pizza Hut email to be delivered. Separately, is ExtractText broken? I have legitimate invoices that are hitting multiple money rules. Is this the expected behavior? Any advice on how to deal with it?
