.online will be a problem for us, a quick grep of 2 mail servers shows a
good few FPs, also doubling up seems counter productive, but add those
with pother rules and it easily triggers limits
On 02/05/2022 11:47, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Did it cause a fp with a score of 5.0 or higher?
On Sun, May 1, 2022, 21:46 Alex <mysqlstud...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Four points for a .online TLD with KAM rules
* 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs
* [URI: www.lci-mtc.online (online)]
* 2.0 KAM_SOMETLD_ARE_BAD_TLD .bar, .buzz, .cam, .casa, .cfd, .club,
* .date, .guru, .live, .online, .press, .pw, .quest, .rest, .sbs,
* .shop, .stream, .top, .trade, .work, .xyz TLD abuse
$ spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 4.0.0-r1898781
running on Perl version 5.34.1
--
Regards,
Noel Butler
This Email, including attachments, may contain legally privileged
information, therefore at all times remains confidential and subject to
copyright protected under international law. You may not disseminate
this message without the authors express written authority to do so.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender then
delete all copies of this message including attachments immediately.
Confidentiality, copyright, and legal privilege are not waived or lost
by reason of the mistaken delivery of this message.
