> On May 10, 2022, at 5:57 PM, Martin Gregorie <mar...@gregorie.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 2022-05-10 at 17:29 -0600, Philip Prindeville wrote:
>> 
>> You're correct that they're different in every message received.
>> 
> So write a rule that fires on any header name that *doesn't* match
> anything in the list of legit headers as defined in the relevant RFCs.


See my original message.

I can't think of a single way to match each header, and then test for any of 
them not matching the pattern...


> 
> Of course you may need to extend that list to include some extras, such
> as headers injected by SA itself, as well as DMARC, DKIM, SPF etc.


That's the easy part.


> 
> Martin
> 
> 

Reply via email to