On 1/8/2023 4:00 PM, joe a wrote:
On 1/8/2023 3:50 PM, joe a wrote:
SA version 3.4.5
Gears are clashing, clutch is slipping, among other things.
Trying to exclude certain checks, via spamhouse services "by the book"
When placing these values in local.cf:
RCVD_IN_ZEN 0
RCVD_IN_XBL 0
RCVD_IN_PBL 0
"spamassassin --lint" complains. Yet SA starts without complaint and
seems to not run those tests.
Placing "score" at the beginning of the line makes lint happy and SA
seems to start fine and also does not run those tests.
So, one assumes it is a typo in the docs, or, one is expected to infer
the "score" word.
Yet I still see this while "skip_rbl_checks 1" (in both above scenarios):
"RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS RBL: ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE:"
Which suggests that one runs despite the directive or, I am using the
wrong one.
And the answer to the latter is "I had the wrong directive". Which is
obvious. Now.
Correcting myself, yet again, "score" needs to be specified, it seems,
otherwise this is seen in /var/log/mail:
2023-01-08T15:00:42.854109-05:00 auxilary spamd[14937]: config: failed
to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": RCVD_IN_ZEN 0
2023-01-08T15:00:42.854573-05:00 auxilary spamd[14937]: config: failed
to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": RCVD_IN_XBL 0
2023-01-08T15:00:42.854908-05:00 auxilary spamd[14937]: config: failed
to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf": RCVD_IN_PBL 0
Contrary to some, there is value in following logs when making changes.
who'd have thought that.
