On 8/2/23 13:28, Reindl Harald wrote:
then i bet you have the same "RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS" as the OP which means you are not capable to operate a mailserver

https://www.spamhaus.org/returnc/pub/

throwen against our spamfilter it would be blocked without any question - above 8.0 points the spamass-milter rejects

Content analysis details:   (32.3 points, 5.5 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.0 CUST_DNSBL_26_UCE2     RBL: dnsbl-uce-2.thelounge.net
                            (dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net)
                           [60.176.201.72 listed in dnsbl-uce-2.thelounge.net]
 6.5 CUST_DNSBL_4_ZEN_PBL   RBL: zen.spamhaus.org (pbl.spamhaus.org)
                            [60.176.201.72 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 5.5 CUST_DNSBL_6_ZEN_XBL   RBL: zen.spamhaus.org (xbl.spamhaus.org)
 1.0 CUST_DNSBL_25_NSZONES  RBL: bl.nszones.com
                            [60.176.201.72 listed in bl.nszones.com]
 5.5 BAYES_80               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 80 to 95%
                            [score: 0.9084]
 0.1 HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM      Envelope sender username looks random
 0.1 HK_RANDOM_FROM         From username looks random
 6.5 CUST_DNSBL_2_SORBS_DUL RBL: dnsbl.sorbs.net
                            (dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net)
                            [60.176.201.72 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.1 SPF_NONE               SPF: sender does not publish an SPF Record
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 0.1 TVD_SPACE_RATIO        No description available.
 2.5 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
-0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE   No description available.
 0.5 INVALID_MSGID          Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC 2822
 2.5 TVD_SPACE_RATIO_MINFP  Space ratio (vertical text obfuscation?)
 0.5 BOGOFILTER_PROB_SPAM   BOGOFILTER: No description available.

Wow! What a charming response! You must be a LOT of fun at parties, and have lots of friends! <eyeroll>

No, I did not get that response. I don't have any of those specific spam to sample, as I have not gotten one today. But the last spam I got that slipped through SA had this score:

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DEAR_SOMETHING,
        DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,
        HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,RCVD_IN_PBL,
        SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no

So nothing about any tests not working, or queries being rejected. Nothing that looks like misconfiguration on my end. I am not saying there are no misconfigurations on my end, but if there are, it's not super obvious to me.

Cheers!
--
Thomas

Reply via email to