On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 06:45:03PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote: > Well, it's not ok to send html mail at all. But I just got a non-spam, > actual messages from a human, that other than being html, was not at all > spammy. The HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE rule fired.
OK... and why do you think it is a problem? To wit: % egrep -hr 'score.* HTML_FONT_SIZE_' /var/lib/spamassassin score HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE 0.001 score HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE 0.001 IOW, those are NOT spam indicators at all. There are just there so you can construct other meta-rules... > I can't post the whole message, but there is Well, perhaps you should create minimal representative example then. > <div dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-s= > ystem, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0,= > 0, 0);"> > At quick glance, Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm (at least in 3.4.6 version of SA) does not trigger on CSS style "font-size: *pt" at all, but e.g. on (deprecated) HTML "<font size=*>" which is totally different metric from "pt", and can range from 1 to 7 (with 3 being "default text size"). i.e. https://www.w3docs.com/learn-html/html-font-tag.html You should probably try to trim your original mail until you find out what HTML tags are actually triggering that rule and why. > Do other people see HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE on messages where it doesn't > seem to fit? No... When I do get it, it seems to be mostly on spammy HTML emails (but most HTML I get is spam anyway, as I opt out of HTML whenever possible). -- Opinions above are GNU-copylefted.
