On Friday, May 27, 2005, 4:13:22 PM, Robert Menschel wrote: > Hello Jeff,
> Friday, May 27, 2005, 1:06:46 AM, you wrote: JC>> On Thursday, May 26, 2005, 5:58:02 PM, Robert Menschel wrote: JC>>>> 2. Would they be appropriate to whitelist (i.e. exclude from JC>>>> listing) in SURBLs? >>> Unlikely, since the web sites mentioned in the emails are rarely the >>> same as the From address or routing server. However, the primary web >>> sites within those emails might be good candidates for the SURBL >>> whitelist. >>> Bob Menschel JC>> Fair enough. You don't happen to have a list of those JC>> corresponding websites do you? :-) > Not readily handy, but if you can find me a few extra hours :-), I can > scan my corpus and put together a partial list. > Bob Menschel > (and no, this holiday weekend doesn't count -- I'll be back at the > office for a network change at 9:00 tonight, spending 4 hours > Sat/Sun on an A/P archival program, another 4 on Sunday for G/L and > physical inventories, and preparing Monday for major changes to our > credit authorization system) No rush, but if you can get them sometime that would be great! :-) Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
