On Thursday, May 26, 2005, 12:49:05 PM, Evan Langlois wrote: > On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 10:42 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> For site wide, I'm pretty much against it. I know people will argue that >> point. I'm obviously biased towards SARE rules updated with RDJ. And the use >> of URIBL.com lists. But these allow a general users, or a sitewide install >> to "set and forget". Which is what we strive for, so SA can be more widley >> excepted. >> >> I have a 99% filter rate without bayes. And I'm proud of that. > I've been testing URIBL and SURBL against just reversing the hostnames > and looking it up on SBL-XBL, SBL and XBL have numeric IP addresses, so they shouldn't match host names. SURBLs on the other hand have mostly domain names with a few IPs. Whatever appears in URI host portions is what goes into SURBLs. Usually URIs have domain names so that's what most of the SURBL records are. Cheers, Jeff C. -- Jeff Chan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.surbl.org/
