Toll, Eric wrote: > > You can call me easily amused, as I haven't seen these rules > kick in before. Ok so 44 points isn't impressive when your > kill is at 7.1 ? > > > Let's see some of _your_ high point hall-of-famers then, > after all caring means sharing :)
I'm on a semi-conservative scoring policy here (I often reduce the scores of SARE rules that I feel are scored too high, but I do use several SARE sets) So far this week's winner is: Jun 13 08:54:22 Message from 210.178.87.1 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to evi-inc.com is spam, SpamAssassin (score=53.467, required 5, autolearn=spam, AB_URI_RBL 1.00, BAYES_99 5.40, BIZ_TLD 0.10, BLACK_URI_RBL 2.00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 3.33, DCC_CHECK 1.00, DRUGS_ERECTILE 1.00, DRUGS_ERECTILE_OBFU 1.50, GAPPY_SUBJECT 2.27, HTML_60_70 0.11, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10, INFO_GREYLIST_NOTDELAYED -0.00, JP_URI_RBL 1.00, LOCAL_BACKHAIR 1.00, L_b_MaskedW0rdsc 1.00, MANY_EXCLAMATIONS 0.83, MIME_HTML_ONLY 0.32, OB_URI_RBL 2.10, RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 0.20, RAZOR2_CHECK 1.05, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 1.50, RCVD_IN_CHINA_KR 2.50, RCVD_IN_DSBL 0.71, RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY 2.34, RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP 1.20, RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0.00, RCVD_IN_XBL 4.92, SARE_OBFU_CIALIS 3.10, SPAMCOP_URI_RBL 3.00, SUBJ_HAS_SPACES 4.10 , SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID 2.68, WS_URI_RBL 2.10) SA 2.64, Mail::SpamcopURI, razor, dcc and these rulesets: SARE and other web published sets: antidrug.cf spamcop_uri.cf uribl_uri.cf 70_sare_adult.cf 70_sare_specific.cf 70_sare_evilnum0.cf 71_sare_adult_rescore.cf 70_sare_evilnum1.cf 99_FVGT_Tripwire.cf 70_sare_obfu0.cf 99_sare_fraud_post25x.cf 70_sare_random.cf The following are hacked-up collections of rules from the list and other places: fvgt.cf blackholes_us.cf german.cf lotto.cf rolex.cf These are mostly local rules, but might have some from list rulsets mixe in: bayes_ignore.cf advert.cf boca_raton.cf evi_misc.cf evi_comprules.cf obfu.cf local-virus.cf local_spamrules.cf local_comprules.cf local-brazil.cf local-info.cf local_porn.cf spamtrap.cf local.cf mkettler_custom.cf
