On Thursday 18 August 2005 11:46 pm, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 11:20 PM 8/18/2005, you wrote: > >Got three of these tonight with the same trojan, SA detected the other two > > as spam, this one slipped through just a bit under the wire. > > Spamassassin doesn't try to detect viruses. That's what virus scanners are > best at.
Realize that Matt, though usually there is enough of a spam signature for SA to tag the actual message as spam, in this one case there just wasn't enough. Although this is a standalone box with no windows on it at all, guess I could set one up anyway. Thanks -- Chris Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 06:11:56 up 15 days, 14:48, 2 users, load average: 0.60, 0.45, 0.23 Mandriva Linux 10.1 Official, kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
