nick wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
Hi everyone,
I received a call from our presidents husband stating several
messages he
had
sent never made it to her.
In the logs it says it was rejected , but it gives no reason
And not just for him, here's some sample entries
2005-11-09 14:51:14 1EZvyT-0009Y5-6G
H=cpe-66-61-52-164.midsouth.res.rr.com
(bridget) [66.61.52.164] F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> temporarily rejected
after
DATA
2005-11-09 14:51:42 1EZvyv-0009Y6-Q3 H=imo-m26.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.7]
F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> temporarily rejected after DATA
2005-11-09 14:54:29 1EZw1d-000AZF-1t H=lists.fdncenter.org
[206.17.146.50]
F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> temporarily rejected after DATA
Anyone experience this?
This looks like your MTA rejecting it, not spamassassin.
Oh, ok, any ideas why?
I do see other rejects have the reason appended
Checking for rejected mail:
2005-11-09 00:03:54 1EZi7e-000Het-74 H=(mail.fdsjsu.com) [58.180.196.234]
F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rejected after DATA: This message scored 22.7
points. Congratulations!
2005-11-09 00:26:25 1EZiTY-000Hfn-D7 H=pim-112-112.focalexmail.com
[206.81.112.112] F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rejected after
DATA:
This message scored 9.3 points. Congratulations!
Can someone perhaps point me in the right direction?
Rejecting the mail after DATA?
Spamassassin runs behind my MTA, if the sender passes blacklist checks
and any other obvious no-nos, it's then passed to spamassassin which
NEVER discards email, but places them in a spam folder.
Discarding emails based on a spam score is a bad idea. As you can see
quite clearly, the reasons behind the discard/tagging aren't logged, so
false positives can't be corrected.
Removing spamassassin from the front line would my first step.
Haha you just rejected me too!!!!!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host
mail.familycareintl.org[68.167.21.154] said:
550 This message scored 8.9 points. Congratulations! (in reply to
end of
DATA command)
Please, for your sake, get spamassassin behind your MTA.
