> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:49 PM
> To: Chris Lear
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: rules better than bayes?
> 
> Chris Lear wrote:
> > * Jim Maul wrote (11/01/06 17:48):
> > [...]
> >> i dont have any sa-stats.pl on my system, and i recall 
> some confusion 
> >> with different scripts named the same thing so im not 
> sure.  If you 
> >> can provide me with a location to obtain the sa-stats.pl 
> script you 
> >> are talking about i'll try to give it a run when i get 
> some time.  Im 
> >> running 2.64 through qmail-scanner if it matters.
> > 
> > Here's a version of sa-stats that works. I remember having 
> a hard time 
> > finding it, so hopefully this saves you some effort.
> > I've edited this line:
> > if (!defined $FILE) { $FILE='^spamd$' }  # regex but it's 
> overridable 
> > on the commandline anyway.
> > 
> > Chris
> > 
> > 
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> > 
> > # file: sa-stats.pl
> > # date: 2005-07-27
> > # version: 0.9
> > # author: Dallas Engelken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # desc: SA 3.x 
> log parser
> > 
> 
> This appears to be for 3.x (the description above).  Will 
> this work for
> 2.64 which im still running?  Is there a working version 
> somewhere that will?
> 

Tell ya truth, I don't even know if it works on 2.64.   It was created
after 3.0 was released.  If your SA logs to maillog, just run it and
find out.  If you see data, it does... It doesn't take long to test this
perl script because it doesn't have any prereqs that wouldn't already be
on a SA installed box.

There is also http://www.rulesemporium.com/programs/sa-stats-1.0.txt for
3.1.x which supports per-domain and per-user stats... But that's just
FYI.

Dallas

Reply via email to