Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 05:02:25PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: >> Jim C. Nasby wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 04:40:40PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: >>>> I would also check to make sure you don't have a lot of spam coming in >>>> that's >>>> getting autolearned as ham. (note: the learner's idea of score is very >>>> different >>>> than the final message score, so a message CAN be tagged as spam, and >>>> still get >>>> autolearned as ham) >>> >>> What would be the easiest way to do that? Grep through my caughtspam >>> maildir? >> That would be the way I'd check.. grep for "autolearn=ham" > > Nothing autolearned.
Nothing autolearned at all? or nothing autolearned as ham? Are there any autolearn strings? Are they all "autolearn=no"? are there any decent number that are autolearn=failed or autolearn=disabled?
