From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday, February 16, 2006, 9:07:48 PM, Theo Dinter wrote:
I was going to tell you that the stats were real-time, but that's only
true for the SURBL rules. URIBL hits aren't being reused during the
weekly runs since 3.1 doesn't have those rules.
So I did a small tweek and generated my own live results for mails from
the past 2 weeks:
MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
0 25247 4117 0.860 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
0.00000 85.9794 14.0206 0.860 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
35.418 41.1930 0.0000 1.000 0.90 0.00 URIBL_JP_SURBL
34.665 40.3177 0.0000 1.000 0.88 0.00 URIBL_SC_SURBL
26.069 30.3204 0.0000 1.000 0.80 0.00 URIBL_AB_SURBL
28.024 32.5464 0.2915 0.991 0.61 0.00 URIBL_OB_SURBL
48.113 55.7492 1.2873 0.977 0.55 0.00 URIBL_BLACK
0.293 0.3406 0.0000 1.000 0.47 0.00 URIBL_PH_SURBL
0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.42 0.00 URIBL_RED
0.000 0.0000 0.0000 0.500 0.42 0.01 T_URIBL_XS_SURBL
37.539 42.4763 7.2626 0.854 0.38 0.00 URIBL_WS_SURBL
0.548 0.3446 1.7974 0.161 0.03 0.00 URIBL_GREY
Should the ham hit rate of WS really be 7%? That seems rather
high. May we ask you to please double check that result?
Indeed! I get this here out of 90,000 mail messages:
7 URIBL_WS_SURBL 12628 2.16 13.90 39.91 0.03
That's hitting 40% of everything marked as spam and only 0.03% of
everything marked as ham here.
{o.o}
