Dan wrote:
Thought you might enjoy this unintended peak at the construction of
randomized header variables:
(SMTPD32-8.15) id ACE84FB700A2; Wed, 31 May 2006 06:16:08 -0400
Received: from [221.7.214.83]
by
id 1FlNkA-00029J-ST
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 31 May 2006 03:16:05 -0700
X-Message-Info:
%RNDDIGIT13%RNDLCCHAR13%RNDUCCHAR12%RNDLCCHAR13%RNDUCCHAR13%RNDDIGIT13%RNDUCCHAR13%RNDLCCHAR15%RNDDIGIT13%RNDLCCHAR13%RNDUCCHAR13%RNDLCCHAR13%RNDUCCHAR13%RNDDIGIT13%RNDUCCHAR13%RNDDIGIT13%RNDLCCHAR13%RNDUCCHAR13%RNDLCCHAR13%RNDUCCHAR13%RNDDIGIT13
Received: from dns%RNDDIGIT13yahoo.com (216.80.250.105) by
%RNDLCCHAR13%RNDDIGIT13-%RNDLCCHAR13%RNDDIGIT12.yahoo.com with Microsoft
I actually have postfix header checks that hunt down and kill this sort
of stuff. It's commoner than you think. Well no, quite infrequent, the
test is cheap...
David
--
Much of the propaganda that passes for news in our own society is given
to immobilising and pacifying people and diverting them from the idea
that they can confront power. -- John Pilger
