On 25-Jun-06, at 12:58 PM, "Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Personally, nowadays I believe bouncing messages back to the alleged sender is a waste of resources and bandwidth with the amount of forgery going on. I wish that admins would configure their servers to stop that practice. Complaining to those admins I'm afraid will be an exercise in futility as trying to reach the right person will be nearly impossible and risks becoming a full time job in itself. My vote would be for setting SPF for HARDFAIL as soon as is feasible, after all dealing with forgery is what SPF was designed for. Sure, unless those ISPs are checking against SPF it may not help but that situation is getting better all the time as more and more SPF is being deployed. -- Gino Cerullo Pixel Point Studios 21 Chesham Drive Toronto, ON M3M 1W6 T: 416-247-7740 F: 416-247-7503 |
- Re: Bounced messages for email from forged em... Gino Cerullo
- Re: Bounced messages for email from forg... John D. Hardin
- Re: Bounced messages for email from ... Gino Cerullo
- RE: Bounced messages for email f... Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster
- RE: Bounced messages for ema... John D. Hardin
- Re: Bounced messages fo... Gino Cerullo
- Re: Bounced message... Michael Monnerie
- Re: Bounced mes... Graham Murray
- Re: Bounced mes... Benny Pedersen
- Examples of Received He... Jim Hermann - UUN Hostmaster
- Re: [SPAM] Examples... John D. Hardin