I really don't understand why you bring this up. I do not want SA to check the .exe. I just want the rule to fire so that it goes over my SPAM threshold when an .exe is attached. right now the rule does not fire unless the attachment had a correspondily correct content-type. In my case it does not because the spammer has disguised it. I will never run an .exe on my mac so I just want the mail to be treated as SPAM when it has a .exe attachment not only when it has an .exe attachment with the correct content type.
Quoting "John D. Hardin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 14 Aug 2006, Robert Nicholson wrote: > > > Any plans to change this? It's obviously an area where the spammer > > has found a way to work around the rule. > > SA is not an antivirus tool, and an attached executable is not spam, > it is a security attack. > > If you're not willing to run a traditional virus scanner, may I > suggest this as an alternative for attachment policy enforcement: > > http://www.impsec.org/email-tools/procmail-security.html > > -- > John Hardin KA7OHZ ICQ#15735746 http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] > key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Windows and its users got mentioned at home today, after my wife the > psych major brought up Seligman's theory of "learned helplessness." > -- Dan Birchall in a.s.r > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
