From: Dennis Teel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> At 08:05 AM 8/15/2006, you wrote:
> > 
> > Dennis Teel wrote:
> > > Is anyone out there using spampd? I've been trying to setup a
> > > Spamassassin relay mail server and I'm really having performance
> > > issues. Our incoming MTA is averaging about 3 message per second. I
> > > would think that Spamassassin could keep up with that just fine. Is
> > > anyone else having problems with spampd and performance?
> > 
> > What are the specs on your server?  What options do you use with
> > spamd?
> > 
> > SA tends to be a memory hog.  The more add-on rulesets and plugins you
> > use, the bigger each process becomes.  Usually, the limiting factor
> > for SA is memory, not CPU speed.  Check your memory usage when the
> > system becomes slow.  If it's swapping, lower the number of spamd
> > children, restart spamd and continue monitoring.
> 
> I'm not using spamd, I'm using spampd:
> http://www.worlddesign.com/index.cfm/rd/mta/spampd.htm

Interesting.  I haven't used that program, but based on the
description, it should have the same type of memory requirements as
spamd, so my suggestions still apply.

-- 
Bowie

Reply via email to