OK, but isn't spamd the "settings" file for spamassassin? How does spamassassin know how to work if spamd is not used when amavis is doing the routing?
And if spamassissin is still the "anti-spammer" where do I tell it that it's not doing it's job properly? Thanks by the way for all the feedback so far. It's really encouraging to see people engaged and trying to help.... Mike John Andersen wrote: > > On Saturday 02 September 2006 15:18, mikemacfr wrote: >> I'm a bit confused? >> >> I thought amavis was the virus scanner bit? And spamassassin took care of >> the spam bit? > > Amavis is a router sort of. > > It takes mail from your mta, sends it thru one or more engines > (spamassassin, > antivirus, and some other more rarely used options) and then (optionally) > hands it back to your MTA for delivery via yet another engine, procmail, > cyrus, etc. > > Its glue-ware. > -- > _____________________________________ > John Andersen > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/OS-X-Server-spam-still-getting-through-%3A-%28-tf2206629.html#a6120705 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.
