On Wednesday 18 October 2006 13:17, angel bosch took the opportunity to say:
> are all mails supossed to contain X-Spam* headers?
>
> im receiving spam marked as spam with this headers:
>
> X-Spam: Not detected
> X-Spam-Status: True ; 24.9 / 5.0

How do you *call* SpamAssassin, how have you configured the software that 
calls it and SA itself? By default, SA adds X-Spam-Checker-Version, 
X-Spam-Level, and X-Spam-Status headers to all mail, and X-Spam-Flag: YES to 
spam. Those lines seem to be added by some other software. It wouldn't 
surprise me if the first line was in the spam to begin with, as a lame 
attempt to bypass spam checking.

> but i also receive lot of other mails without any X-Spam header.  is
> this by design? must i enable something in the config to enable headers
> on all mails?

> it is possible that server can't handle too much mails and bypass those
> that can't process?

That is possible, yes. It can also be that the messages are too big (over 250 
kB, usually). But again it depends on how SA is called.

-- 
Magnus Holmgren        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                       (No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)

Attachment: pgpC1KipZDBD1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to