In my experience (which is not statistically comfirmed), Razor
catches more spam than DCC.
Usually if DCC hits, then Razor will probably also hit. This is not
true the other way around:
if Razor hits, DCC regularly doesn't hit. Giampaolo's comments are
also valid: if they both
hit, you get higher scores, which may just be enough to push a spam
above your required_score.
Leander
On 19-okt-2006, at 10:15, Jo Rhett wrote:
John Andersen wrote:
Contemplating adding DCC to my SA config. I already do the SURBL
tests and Razor2.
Will I likely gain any thing via this? Does DCC catch what other
tests miss?
DCC and Razor are very similar in approach. DCC has recently lost
a lot of community support due to policy decisions made by the guy
who runs it, which is pretty much why Razor sprang into existence.
We have them in parallel on one of our work systems, and I can't
say that DCC is better than Razor. It catches some that Razor
misses, but Razor seems to catch more than DCC misses. 95% of the
time they are identical in result.
--
Jo Rhett
Network/Software Engineer
Net Consonance
--
Leander Koornneef
IC&S B.V.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ic-s.nl
IC&S biedt Service & Support, Development en Consultancy op
uiteenlopende
internet-gerelateerde platformen, met een voorliefde voor Open Source.
Let op: mijn emailadres is gewijzigd naar: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
