On Sat, November 4, 2006 02:34, Tony Finch wrote: > On Fri, 3 Nov 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote: >> Not a false positive if their servers are broken. > True from the RFCI point of view, but NOT true from the SpamAssassin point > of view. These messages are wanted by their recipients so should not be > scored as spam by SpamAssassin.
complains go to spamassassin not to amazon.com ? what a wonderfull world this is :/ -- "This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails."
