On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 07:26 -0500, Jack Gostl wrote: > I'm considering lowering the autolearn threshhold to less than zero. I > wonder if anyone else has any thoughts on this as well.
I set the autolearn for ham to -10, so it has to be very hammy to get learned. Seems to work well. SA should allow autolearn to be separately turned on for ham and spam; using a very low rating is kludgy. I'd rather be able to say explicitly "autolearn spam, don't autolearn ham". Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) +61-2-64957160 (h) http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob)
